Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Value of husband’s business interest is reduced at divorce

After 27 years of marriage, a Colorado couple got divorced. The husband’s main asset was a share of an oil and gas company that was worth $2.5 million. However, for purposes of dividing the couple’s property, the divorce judge reduced the value of the husband’s share by one-third, to about $1.6 million.

The judge explained that this was a “marketability discount.” The idea of a marketability discount is that, while the husband’s interest might have been “worth” $2.5 million if you simply divided the value of the business by his percentage interest, it wouldn’t be “worth” $2.5 million if he tried to sell his interest to a third party. That’s because a third party probably wouldn’t want to pay full value for a minority stake in a business, given that he or she would be a minority owner and would have no control over the operations.

Marketability discounts are common in certain types of accounting. For instance, the value of a share in a family business is often reduced for tax purposes because few people would want to be a minority owner in someone else’s family business.

The wife argued that marketability discounts shouldn’t apply, and in fact don’t apply in many situations. For instance, in Colorado, if a corporation buys out a dissenting minority shareholder, it’s not allowed to apply a marketability discount in calculating the value of the shareholder’s interest.

The case went to the Colorado Supreme Court, which sided with the husband and said that a marketability discount in divorce is different from a discount in the case of a shareholder buyout.

The court didn’t say that marketability discounts should always be applied in divorce cases, but it said the judge was reasonable in applying it in this case.

Call Now Button
Email us now
close slider
  • How Can We help?